I love making these controversial lists : ) Things about Waterworld and Battlefield earth were interesting. I did see them both in the theatre, so I was interested in them. I just thought that each one was very disapointing. With the money and cast involved in each of those movies, they could have done so much more. They had fun concepts, but they were too long and drawn out. The same pretty much goes for interview with a vampire. It starts out well and has an excellent cast, but it gets a little too out there for me. Even when you buy into the idea of vampires and everything that goes with it, the movie was just too long and they did not utilize their very capable cast the way that they could have. In retrospect all of those movies on that list are so bad that they are almost good. Like sometimes it’s fun to watch a really bad movie to make fun of it. Kinda like Mystery Science Theatre 3000. Like how bout the drawn out scene in waterworld when costner purifies his own urine to drink it. That’s pretty funny. I understand the point of the scene, but it is comical. Or how he devolops gills and breathes like a fish. Interview with a vampire is pretty slow and actually started to get boring. There is nothing wrong with liking sci-fi. I like some sci-fi also. To each his own. This is just my opinion, but who am I? Thanks for commenting Valrikrommia, I do appreciate it. I see that we both have written for worthitornot. That’s pretty cool. Take it easy.